PROJECTIVE
METHOD
Psychologists have realized since the 1930s the power of projective
tests to access the deeper self. The Rorschach Ink Blot test is
the most well known though there are numerous others. However it
has always proved difficult to get reliable results from such tests.
The PEP has created a solution to this problem by integrating its
unique projective technique with its unique structured questionnaire.
VISUALISATION
Other profiles return their findings solely by a written or diagramatic
behavioural report. Such reports are often dry and, whilst they
may be accurate if honestly filled in, may prove of less value in
enabling life change and development. This is because we often only
change our behaviour if we can visualise different possible
behaviours. The PEP creates a way to do just that- visualising
both yourself as you are and yourself as you could be. Drawing on
cognition theories and metaphor therapy the PEP engages the emotions
and helps people move beyond ideas to sight and then action.
RECENT
THEORY
The PEP is based upon its own unique constructionist psychological
theory developed through research at Oxford University. This draws
on recent advances in psychological understanding
of personality and other areas. Important notions such as self-expansion,
self-presentation, attachment theory and cognition inform the underlying
PEP model. It supports a comprehensive new personality theory. This
theory unpacks the difference between the two selves
in any individual- the front stage and the back stage; enables understanding
of psychological strategies an individual uses; predicts responses
to stress; opens up choices and possibilities for change; highlights
hidden unconscious issues and obstacles
PSYCHOMETRIC
The PEP has been developed using statistical methods to establish
its reliability and validity. However, a number of unique aspects
of the PEP need to be understood when considering these properties:
-
The PEP is a process rather
than a test. Unlike other tests, it does not provide a one off
'snapshot', but an emerging picture of the story of a person's
development.
-
Some reliability statistical
tests are therefore not applicable- such as test-retest. On
other reliability measures the PEP scores within acceptable
norms for statistical tests.
-
The PEP compares a person's
present state with their personal history and future. A conventional
test compares a person with a wider population sample. Becuase
of this longitudinal studies over at least 12 months are the
best measure of the PEP.
-
The PEP therefore indicates
measures such as the stability and patterns of dynamic interaction
of the traits over time, aswell as raw, singular measures.
-
Intra- and interpopulation
statistics are emerging with some interesting predictive validity
results. However, because of the dynamic nature of the factors
objectified, only longitudinal studies will offer stable indicators
for wider population norms.
-
Factor analysis indicates
7 factors are being objectified by the PEP process. The PEP
is based upon a 7 factor personality model.
-
The growing sample of
personal and team case studies best indicate the validity of
the PEP as a development process.
RIGHT BRAIN
The resurgence of recent psychological interest in right brain creativity
reflects the growing re-integration of the sciences, humanities
and the arts. The PEP spans the divides by utilising imagery to
access, unlock and develop a persons right brain awareness
and potential from within a psychological framework. It helps to
show how right brain creativity is a feature of all people not just
some and how the imagination can be the most powerful facility for
human living.
THE FOLLOWING TEXTS REPRESENT A SELECT
SAMPLE OF THE RESEARCH LITERATURE WHICH HAS INFORMED THE PRIMARY
RESEARCH FOR THE PEP
Altman, et al. in Walsh W.B., K.H.Craik and Price,
R.H., eds. Person-Environment Psychology: Models and Perspectives,
Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum, 1992
Bochner, A.P, Ellis. C. and Tillmann-Healy L.M., Relationships
as Stories, In Duck. S.W. ed. A Handbook of Personal Relationships,
John Wiley and Sons, 1997
Baumeister, R.F and Leary, M.R., The need to belong, Psychological
Bulletin, 117, 497-529
Baumeister R.F, Smart L., and Boden J.M, Relation of threatened
egotism to violence and aggression: the dark side of high self esteem,
Psychological review, 103, 5-33
Bartholomew, K. and Horowitz, L.M., (1991), Attachment styles
among young adults: A test of a four category model, Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244,
Bowlby, J., Attachment and Loss, Vol 1, 1969, Vol 2, 1973, Vol 3,
1980, New York, basic Books
Carlsen, M-B, Meaning Making: Therapeutic Processes in Adult
Development, New York, Norton and Co, Inc.1988,
Duck, S.W. Meaningful Relationships: Talking Sense and Relating.
Thousand Oaks, CA Sage 1994
Grove, David, J., and Panzer, Bazil, Resolving Traumatic Memories:
Metaphors and Symbols in Psychotherapy, Irvington, New York,
1989
Gergen, Kenneth,The Saturated Self : Dilemmas of Identity in
Contemporary Life, New York: Basic Books, 1990
Goffman, E., The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Penguin,
1959
Jones, E.E. and Pittman T.S. Toward a General theory of Self
presentation in Suls. J (ed.) Psyhcological Perspectives on
the Self, Hillsdale, N.J. Erlbaum, 1982
Johnson, J, (1981),The Self-Disclosure and Self-Presentational
views of item response dynamics, Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 40, 761-769, Lawley, James and Tompkins, Penny,
Metaphors in Mind, Transformation through Symbolic Modeling,
The Developing Co. Press, 2000
Snyder, M., Public appearances, private realities: the psychology
of self monitoring, New York Freeman, 1987
Siegelman, Ellen Y., Metaphor and Meaning in Psychotherapy,
Guildford Press, London, 1990
Tetlock, P and Manstead, A, (1985), Impression management versus
intra-psychic explanations, Social Psychology, Psychological
review, 92, 59-77 Tice, D, et al. W (1995), When modesty prevails:
differential favorability of self-presentation to friends and strangers,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1120-1134 |
Monitor
r
Landscape
r
Reports
r
Science
r
Licence
r
Sample
|